The bottom line is that running all three is not redundant. In this respect, there is some complementary (but not identical or antagonistic) overlap between Fidelizer and Process Lasso with respect to core usage. Unlike AO and Fidelizer, Process Lasso does not seek to change the number of services, processes, etc running, but rather the way processes are used (see the PL info on their site for a more detailed explanation). Certainly, there is no negative impact in GUI mode in my system.
If there was a negative impact of running Process Lasso on sound quality in core mode, I suspect that someone would have mentioned it by now. I use AO, Fidelizer and Process Lasso with WS2016 in GUI mode in a dual PC system, but there are other forum participants using all three in core mode. I use JPlay Mini for playback on Control-PC so I do not need networking services at all. I am wondering if FP and AO already address what Process Lasso does, and if having more processes running would actually make things sound worse? Should I also use Process Lasso?ĭoes anybody have experience using ALL three of these together?
I am using Audiophile Optimizer and Fidelizer Pro.
I have a JPLay Dual PC setup and am running Windows Server 2016 Core, no GUI, on BOTH the Control PC and Audio PC.
0 kommentar(er)
